Bengaluru: In order to become liable for an offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, ie, cheque bounce cases, the accused is requi.
The hearing in Rajpal Yadav's Rs 9 crore check bounce case is scheduled for March 18. Read further to know what could happen ...
The Karnataka High Court quashed proceedings against ND Developers, stating that criminal liability for a cheque bounce requires the accused to have active control over the account.
Filmfare on MSN
Rajpal Yadav Dismisses Claims That He Cried in Front of Judge in Rs 9 Crore Cheque Bounce Case
Rajpal Yadav has denied reports that he was seen crying in court during proceedings ...
When the drawer of the cheque could not have exercised real control or authority upon the relevant bank account on which a cheque is drawn, its dishonour would not warrant proceedings under the ...
Actor Rajpal Yadav breaks silence on his Rs. 9 crore cheque bounce case, calling it an “ego clash,” as his lawyer interrupts ...
Even as he navigates a high-profile Rs 9 crore cheque bounce case, actor Rajpal Yadav has chosen to step into a new space, ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results